What I’m reading this week

  • Global VC blog directory (Larry Cheng)
  • Venture capitalists who aren’t jerks (WSJ)
  • Goldman and hits driven businesses (The Atlantic)
  • US colleges aren’t graduating their students (NY Times)
  • Do buyouts still create value (Journal of Finance)
  • Why Jon Moulton quit, in his own colorful words (PEHub)
  • What happens in financial markets when everyone runs for the exit (CEPR)
  • Inflation fears (New Yorker)
  • Good piece on the culture behind Zappos (New Yorker)
  • Wired piece on Nanosolar (Wired)
  • History behind Silicon Valley (Steve Blank)
  • How the oil industry was the original Silicon Valley (Forbes)
  • Yergin on oil (Foreign Policy)
  • How long does it take to build a tech startup (IPO Dashboards)
  • What does it take to go public today (IPO Dashboards)
  • Good review of Snow Leopard (ArsTechnica)
  • Why Cadbury’s chocolates taste so bad in the US (WSJ)
  • Lloyd Blankfein on banker pay (Bloomberg)
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • HackerNews
  • Netvibes
  • Twitter

Weekend reading

  • Great piece by Krugman on how our economic crisis has deepened the divide between freshwater and saltwater economists (New York Times)
  • 2010 could be the year of the IPO (DealJournal)
  • Facebook status updates vs Tweets (Lightspeed blog)
  • Henry Paulson’s longest night (VanityFair)
  • Who paid what for Skype (GigaOM)
  • Storing all the stuff we accumulate (NY Times)
  • The coming cupcake bust (Slate)
  • Getco and algo trading (Fortune)
  • How a software engineer invented a medical device to deliver chemo directly to a tumor (ZDnet)
  • Annals of the obvious: men lose their minds speaking to pretty women (Telegraph)
  • Of liquidity, competition and platforms (Bob Wyman)
  • Plants vs. trees (TED)
  • For teens, texting has replaced talking (WSJ)
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • HackerNews
  • Netvibes
  • Twitter

Early stage investing in the Mideast

I’ve known about the Maktoob acquisition (and its price tag) for some time now, when the deal was still perceived as a rumor in the market. The exact figure of the deal isn’t known but Yahoo disclosed the rough price tag in their most recent earnings report. My friend Faisal Ghori, at Middle East Ventures, recently wrote a piece in the Huffington Post about what this acquisition meant for technology investment in the region.

Like all initial acquisitions in an emerging region, the acquisition certainly validates the market. Some of the fastest growing websites, on a percentage basis, are either in Arabic or Middle East focused, primarily because the region is still catching up to the rest of the world from an internet usage perspective.

Faisal’s title is spot on – Maktoob does give hope. Entrepreneurs in the Middle East are operating in a climate that is remarkably challenging, at least from a technology and company building perspective. I know in Jordan Queen Rania and others are trying to open up the business climate; in Saudi, there is an effort to build a world-class research university that the sponsors are hoping will lead to a knowledge economy; there have been a couple of (mostly failed) attempts in Dubai during the boom era to do the same; and even Libya is getting in the mix with its NECD.

But from a venture perspective, the region has a long way to go. Twelve years leading to a ~$80m outcome is just not a great return from a venture perspective. The Arab world isn’t alone in this conundrum. Despite all the buzz around India, it’s as challenging for an early stage company targeting the domestic Indian market to grow into a large, valuable enterprise. The largest exit there is around the $500m mark, which is certainly not good, but not what investors on the venture side need to see on the largest possible outcome.

Until entrepreneurs in the region start building companies that target large, addressable markets outside the Arab world, I don’t think you’ll see really large outcomes in the region. I’ve looked at the data for GDP/capita and growth rates, and the economic fundamentals just don’t justify very valuable businesses on the early stage consumer market if the company is only targeting the Arab market. Perhaps I should share some of this data in a later post. I could be wrong here – some of the things I’ve seen in the online gaming space suggest that you can build rapidly growing companies even on the back of low GDP/capita countries, but that’s my two cents.

I wish it was different. I’ve studied Arabic for several years now, first at Stanford (poorly), then in Sana’a for a year (poorly) and most recently at London Business School (again, poorly), where I was the only student in my class to use Arabic to fulfill the school’s second language requirement. I’ve traveled throughout the Middle East, spent time in Fes at the Sacred Music Festival, backpacked through most of Jordan and Yemen, visited Jerusalem, Cairo, the Sinai, Dubai and made the pilgrimage to Mecca. To say I have an affinity for the region and language is a mild understatement.

But I’m glad to see entrepreneurs trying. I’ve heard of someone building a chip startup in Jordan, another doing the same in Egypt to commercialize some academic research around silicon that does decimal math vs binary math (which reduces the need for a pokey software translation layer that is often prone to errors in finance), and Zvi Schreiber’s G.ho.st (Global Hosted Operating System) is an interestingly ambitious project, not just because of its raw technology challenge, but also because it’s being developed jointly by Israelis and Palestinians in Ramallah and Modiin. Similar to what happened in India in the last decade, I’m starting to hear about engineers in the Bay Area think about returning home to the Mideast to build companies. A lot of these will probably be good founder-return businesses (another post) but hopefully there will be a few with broad ambitions to build global companies that might lead to good investment returns. I just think we’re still another five years away right now.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • HackerNews
  • Netvibes
  • Twitter

Ten characteristics of great investors

Matt Blumberg, the founder and CEO of Return Path, wrote an interesting post today on the ten characteristics of great investors, in response to Fred Wilson’s post on the ten characteristics of great entrepreneurs. A quick recap:

  • Great investors know how to give strategic advice without being in the operating weeds of a company
  • Great investors get to know whole management teams, not just CEOs — in fact, great investors become part of the extended management team of their portfolio companies
  • Great investors invite you to do diligence on them by giving you a list of every CEO they’ve ever worked with and asking you to pick the ones you want to talk to
  • Great investors ask great questions
  • Great investors don’t publicly take credit for the success of their investments, even if they were major drivers of that success
  • Great investors show up for meetings on time and don’t spend the meeting using their smartphone
  • Great investors treat their portfolio companies’ money as if it were their own money when spending it on things like lawyers or travel
  • Great investors look for connections to make between their portfolio companies or relevant people but have a strong relevance filter and don’t send junk
  • Great investors never have a ready-made list of the ways they add value to companies — and they specifically never talk about the help they give in recruiting executives or making sales/bus dev introductions
  • Great investors recognize when they have a conflict around a portfolio company and are clear to represent their separate points of view separately

These are good rules of thumb for investors. I’d add five more:

  • Great investors provide great insight and market intelligence their companies otherwise wouldn’t have
  • Great investors provide their entrepreneurs with shortcuts – these are things the companies could have done or reached on their own, but the investor makes it that much it easier
  • Great investors know when to push and when to coddle, even when the entrepreneur feels neither at the time is necessary
  • Great investors are hyper focused on building valuable companies, not just good companies
  • Great investors help their companies stay financed through their lifecycle
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • HackerNews
  • Netvibes
  • Twitter

Startup book pack

Nigel Eccles, an entrepreneur and a friend, wrote this post on Techcrunch raving about Steven Blank’s book. He’s not the first and won’t be the last – Blank’s book is one of the best I’ve seen in the space. It is does the most poignant job of clarifying the difference between a painkiller and a vitamin.

Nigel’s post reminded me of the starter pack I used to give first-time entrepreneurs at Accel. It might be useful to list these books out for my readers.

Business plans: New Business Road Test by John Mullins (not quite a business plan book, but the best I’ve seen in the category)
Building the right product: Four Steps to the Epiphany by Steven Blank (also not quite a business plan book, but insightful and a must-read)
Term sheets: Term Sheets & Valuations by Alex Wilmerding
Entrepreneurial economics: Innovator’s Dilemma by Clayton Christensen
Entrepreneurial marketing: Crossing the Chasm by Geoffrey Moore

I think all of these are must reads for any entrepreneur or venture capitalist.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • HackerNews
  • Netvibes
  • Twitter